Buying

The Escalator Clause

January 12, 2019 By Rick Jarvis

The Escalator Clause

A quick market update –– As I write this in January, we have already been involved in several multiple bid situations with not just our buyer clients, but with one of our listings, too.

So to repeat, it’s January … of 2019, and the market seems to think it is April … of 2017.

To quote the great Roger Daltry, “Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.”

The Who’s Don’t Get Fooled Again still resonates 40 years after its release, doesn’t it?

When the market is tight and demand exceeds the number of houses that are available, prices tend to rise. And when inventory conditions are extremely tight and multiple buyers want the same home, many buyers will employ a clause that will raise the price of their offer based on what the next most competitive offer states.

This additional contract language is called (in most circles) the Escalator Clause.

What is an Escalator Clause (or EC)?

An EC basically states that a purchaser will, under a specific set of circumstances, increase (or escalate) their offering price based on what the highest competitive offer says.

Pro’s Tip –– The best way to win a bidding war is to not get in a bidding war. When you are in a highly competitive market, act decisively early. When you take your time to go see that new listing, or let negotiations drag, the likelihood of another buyer submitting a competitive offer increases. When two buyers want the same house, the seller alwasy wins …

Instead of simply offering a higher fixed price, the EC creates a conditional offer that can automatically increase based on the price and terms offered by the other offer(s).

Clear as mud, right?

Well let’s explore the EC, step by step.

The Contract Price

In the large majority of purchase offers, the buyer will offer a contract to the seller that states:

the price they are willing to pay
the terms under which they are willing to pay it
the condition of the home that they are willing to accept at settlement
the targeted date upon which settlement will occur

These elements, plus many others that are not particularly important to this discussion, are included in any contract offer to purchase a home.

Disclaimer: No two contact situations are the same and thus it is impossible to discuss every possible combination of scenarios. The scenario described below is somewhat typical, but competing offers can vary by price, escalation language, finance types, closing dates, inspection caps and a multitude of different factors. Additionally, the number of offers can have a dramatic impact on the strategy behind how the Escalation Clause is written.

In cases where your offer is the ONLY offer made on the property, a few rounds of back and forth between the two sides are typically required to get the remainder of the terms worked out to each side’s satisfaction –– and an EC isn’t required.

But what happens when two (or more) offers come in on a property? That is when one side (or sometimes both sides) may employ an EC.

Pro’s Tip –– We wrote about bidding wars from the seller’s perspective here in ‘How to Start a Bidding War.’

The EC Contract Price

So while the contract includes a firm price, the EC makes the offer price conditional on several factors including:

what the next best (competitive) offer is
what the maximum offer is
how much the offer will exceed the competitive offer by

Let’s use real numbers.

So let’s say the home is listed for $300,000 and the seller receives two offers.

Offer A states that the purchasers will pay $300,000 for the home. It does not contain an escalator clause.
Offer B states that the purchasers will pay $295,000 for the home but it contains an EC that states that, in the event that a bonafide competitive offer is also submitted, Offer B will escalate the price to $2,000 above the other offer, but not to exceed $310,000.

In this scenario, Offer B escalates to $302,000 under the terms of the EC.

Disclaimer –– Sellers are under no obligation to accept a higher offer. Furthermore, they do not have to supply a reason why they accepted the offer they did. So even if you escalate your offer to an amount greater than the other offer, a seller may still choose to accept the lower one. While it is not typical to take less, it is probably more common than you think and can be incredibly frustrating.

The Maximum (or Walkaway) Price

Note in the prior example that the EC stated that their offer will not exceed $310,000.

So in effect, regardless of the other offer, in no case will Offer B go above $310,000. This basically puts a cap on the escalated offer so that the purchaser is protected and insanity doesn’t ensue.

This maximum (walkaway) number is critical in protecting the purchaser.

In cases where the purchaser is using a low down payment loan, an offer that escalates the contract price well in excess of the asking price may introduce a scenario where the appraisal will be lower than the contract price. If the purchaser has insufficient funds to cover the difference, the loan will likely be denied and the purchaser could find themselves in a pickle.

Pro’s Tip –– In especially hot market segments, often times two or more offers contain escalation clauses. Winning in a ‘multiple-offer-with-escalators’ scenario requires a cool head and an experienced agent.

Another point to note is that losing a home by a small amount when you would have been willing to pay more is a tough pill to swallow. If you set your maximum at $310,000 and lose to an offer of $311,000 –– but would have paid $315,000 –– it stings. So we always counsel our clients to make the maximum offer the price that, if you lose to a higher offer, you walk away without a pang of remorse.

Sometimes, the other side just wants that house more than you do and there is nothing you can do but tip your hat to the winner and start the search process over again.

The ‘Beat It’ Number

This is key –– the ‘Beat It’ number is the amount by which you will make your offer exceed the competitive offer.

Using the above scenario, if Offer B’s EC said that they would exceed the other offer by $50, would that be enough to change the mind of the seller? Probably not, especially if the other offer contained a bigger down payment or other seller friendly terms.

But what if you exceeded the other offer by $100 –– would that do it? Or What about $1,000 –– is that enough? Or is $5,000 higher required to make the seller take your offer over another one?

Pro’s Tip –– Often times, you make an offer only to find out that during the negotiation process, another offer comes in. In this scenario, you can add an EC to your offer if you feel strongly about winning.

The answer is that no magic formula exists to tell you the correct answer. Just know that the amount by which your EC exceeds the next best offer is case specific and should take into account the strength of the other terms in your contract.

Choose the Beat It number carefully –– the amount by which you will exceed the other offer needs to be enough that the seller accepts yours, but not so much that you are throwing money away or placing yourself in financial distress.

Conclusion

As we discussed in our last blog, the market is on the leading edge of a ‘return to normalcy’ where bidding wars and multiple offer scenarios will become less commonplace. That said, we aren’t there yet and many market segments (affordable/close-in) are still largely undersupplied. Expect to continue to see the need for the EC in these segments.

Furthermore, the use of the EC is not the only tactic a buyer (and their agent) can use to win competitive offers. We tell our clients that a contract dedicates two paragraphs to price, but another 10 pages (or more) to the remaining terms. Each one of those terms creates an opportunity for a shrewd buyer to offer the seller a concession that can improve the value of the contract.

So don’t feel that you always have to use an EC to win –– especially if you are a cash buyer or can offer other seller friendly terms.

At the end of the day, the EC is an advanced technique and if applied incorrectly, can cause a buyer to unnecessarily pay more. But when in the hand of a seasoned pro, a properly written EC allows the purchaser to pay as little for the home as possible, despite the pressue of a competitive multiple-bid scenario.

iBuying

January 5, 2019 By Rick Jarvis

handshake hello GIF by Laurène Boglio — Our computer would like to purchase your home.

Ever heard of iBuying? If you haven’t, you can say you heard about it here, first, because it is the newest trend in real estate sales and it is on the way to a market near you –– probably.

So what exactly is iBuying? Well, no one definition exists but generally speaking, iBuying is nothing more than a company (or fund) that buys houses from people directly –– at some amount of discount –– for cash, and typically with a quick closing.

iBuying, in effect, replaces the traditional method of an individual owner putting a sign in the yard and selling to an individual purchaser at a market price.

How Does it Work?

2001 a space odyssey GIF — I’m sorry, Dave. I can’t value your home.

In most cases, the owner of a home will go to an iBuyer website, enter information about their home, and wait for the iBuyer to tell them what they would be willing to pay. The iBuyer company will look at its valuation algorithm and make the seller an offer.

Each iBuyer has a slightly different method, but typically, the offer comes with a mandatory site visit from some representative to verify the condition of the property and the features, size, etc. and to make sure that the information given by the seller is accurate.

If everything checks out, the offer can be accepted and closing will occur quickly and for cash.

Yes, it can be that simple.

The Premise (ok, ‘The Catch’)

The catch is this –- the offers come with a discount.

The iBuyer will use an algorithm that establishes likely market value, but then subtracts the cost of commissions, any required repair money, some carrying cost, and a little bit for profit.

But even if the offers are discounted, they are all cash and come with a quick closing.

The thought is that the offer will be close enough to what a typical seller would net on the sale of their home and, thus, the seller take less to avoid the hassle of the selling process –– and to have the certainty of knowing their home is sold.

i want out house GIF by South Park — Sometimes, iBuying makes sense.

In effect, if the seller believes the ‘hassle to discount’ ratio is in their favor, then they should (in theory) accept the offer. If not, then they can sell via the traditional process.

It is a fascinating idea and one that is taking hold in several markets.

The Players

There are several national players who are attempting to scale this business as we speak –– Zillow Offers being the most notable, but there are others. Knock, OfferPad and OpenDoor are making a lot of noise, while Redfin and a few other brokerages have either launched or are launching their own version of an iBuying program.

And aside from the behemoths mentioned above, local franchised versions also exist –– ’We Buy Ugly Houses’ and Homvestors are forms of iBuying as well, although couched in a more of an opportunistic wrapper.

Heck, even some local investors (typically tied to a local brokerage) have established funds to do roughly the same thing.

The Game

Ok, before you go out and rejoice, thinking that you can trick a computer into making you an above-market offer on your 7 bedroom 1 bath Elvis Pressly themed home that is in need of $50,000 of siding and roof repair, that is not how it works.

The national iBuyers have what is called a ‘Buy Box’ to determine which properties qualify to be purchased. Typically, the ‘Buy Box’ will only include properties that their algorithms can value with a high degree of confidence –– and shy away from the ones that they cannot.

iBuyers will also tend to shy away from thin market segments (i.e. luxury housing) where pricing means fewer buyers and longer marketing times.

So the typical Buy Box will include properties that are newer, more homogenous, less expensive, and otherwise easier to peg a value accurately. Properties that are older, historic, have unique features, are expensive, in need of massive repairs, or are otherwise difficult to determine a fair value for will fall outside of the Buy Box and not qualify for an offer.

So don’t get too excited about an iBuyer coming in and taking your problem property off of your hands at a premium –– they won’t.

Uses and Models

iBuying has applications for sure –– mostly for cases where ‘certainty’ is required or where other factors prevent the home from transferring via conventional means.

If you are a contingent buyer trying to upgrade into a hot market segment, it might make sense to use an iBuyer to sell your home so that you can qualify for the next one
If showing your home repeatedly is burdensome, then selling to an iBuyer makes sense
If you are in need of selling quickly to take a new job, or move to another market, iBuying might also make sense

But in cases where the seller can wait, or where bidding wars are likely to occur, an iBuyer really isn’t necessary.

The Real Uses

So do you know why Zillow really wants to have an iBuyer platform? And Redfin? And the others?

Leads.

A seller inquiring about the value of their home is nothing more than a potential seller raising their hand and identifying themselves as a potential client –– and for any brokerage, that has tremendous value.

So even if the offer is rejected, the lead can still be referred to an agent in the iBuyer network for a referral fee.

Kinda brilliant, isn’t it? You bet it is.

Successful?

The iBuying idea is still rather new and thus, the concepts have not been fully developed and the numbers being reported are not vetted.

https://www.slideshare.net/MikeDelPrete/phoenix-ibuyer-report-teaser

Phoenix is one of the primary testing grounds for iBuying.

A recent article claimed that iBuying represented as much as 3% of the accepted offers in markets where they were operating, but that is largely a self-reported number (as well as a self-serving one) so it remains to be seen.

But even if the iBuyer does not buy in a large number of homes, the leads generated are still of great value to the Realtor community. So for iBuying to be successful, it doesn’t have to just monetize the homes they purchase –– it has to monetize the leads it generates.

Richmond and iBuying

The big players aren’t in Richmond in force, but they are somewhat close (Raleigh, NC) and in some parts of Charlotte.

The closest iBuyer markets are in North Carolina, but no markets in the northeast are in operation.

Some locals are playing in the space here locally, but no one of any real scale.

And since Richmond is an old city with aged housing stock, the likelihood that any iBuying platform would identify Richmond as a target-rich market is low. When you look at the map above, you see no iBuyer presence in the older housing markets of the northeast.

But that said, at some point, we will see some version of the iBuying model enter our market.

Questions Abound

So stay tuned, there are still many questions to be answered.

suspicious thinking GIF by SpongeBob SquarePants — Hmmm …

One of the biggest is ‘what will iBuyers do with the homes they buy?’ Some will simply resell them and others will employ a buy and hold strategy. If that happens, will it put even more pressure on inventory?
The other question is how will iBuying impact appraisals? If the nearest and most recent comparable sale was an iBuyer sale at a 10% discount, will that impact the value of the surrounding properties?
What happens when iBuyers compete with one another? Will the competition between iBuyers squeeze the profits out of the model to such a point that they exit the market?
What if an iBuyer ends up with enough inventory that it can act like CarMax and offer trade-in options? Supposedly, that idea is being discussed.
Lastly, if and when the market goes through an adjustment, are iBuyers going to be willing to purchase assets that are declining in value? Just ask developers and builders what happened to their balance sheets in 2008 – 2012 and how much fun it was to hold onto housing when it was going down in value by 10% a year for 3 straight years? Hopefully, that adjustment is nowhere near, but most felt that way in the years leading up to the recession, too.

I don’t think anyone has the answers yet.

Summary

The iBuying idea has merit, but there is a lot still to be determined.

That said, the key point is that there is a lot of money backing these firms so the iBuying model is going to be here until someone figures it out.

Like a hammer or a lawnmower, iBuying is nothing more than a tool and it has its specific uses. Learning how to use the tool properly will come with time and practice for all involved.

Having a choice is never a bad thing for the consumer and iBuying will provide the public options that they didn’t have before.

2019 and the Return to Normalcy

December 30, 2018 By Rick Jarvis

2019 is going to be a transitional year.

In the same way that you might take your foot off of the gas when you see a yellow light in the distance, 2019 will likely be a year where we see some segments of the real estate market lose a bit of their momentum.

‘A Return to Normalcy’ was a phrase used by Warren Harding during his presidential campaign in the 1920’s to define the period of recovery after WWI …

For many, a slower pace will feel extremely odd. All we have known for the past 5+ seasons is rampant price increases and bidding wars. That said, 2019 is likely the year that the frothiest behaviors will subside –– at least in some segments (which we will touch on in a few paragraphs.)

In reality, what we are beginning to see is not a market in decline, but rather <gasp> the leading edge of a normal market.

Disclaimers

First, I need to disclaim a few things.

Nothing in this post is guaranteed to happen tomorrow, or probably even the next day –– most of the observations are longer-term in nature and represent a shift in direction, but not a bootlegger’s u-turn.
Also, recognize that an individual house value behaves differently than a set (or segment) of houses. Colors, condition, architectural style, yard, appliances –– they all matter to individual buyers and sellers and can impact the value of an individual home. But the behaviors being discussed below refer more to how groups of homes behave in the aggregate.
And lastly, any number of unforeseen events could change things –– and fast. Politics, trade wars, real wars, oil prices, and/or natural disasters all have massive impacts on our economy as a whole. And corporate acquisitions, sales, and/or relocations can all have impacts on our region, specifically.

So with that bit of throat clearing, I proudly bring you the ‘What is Going to Happen in 2019’ prediction post (and if you want to see how I did in prior years, you can find 2018’s post here.)

A Return to Comparative Normalcy

What is normal, anyway? Well, we wrote about that very question at the end of 2018. But the takeaway is that ‘what is normal’ is more of a relative question than an absolute one.

via GIPHY

If you asked ‘1993 Rick’ what I thought of a 5% interest rates and 5% appreciation, I would have been giddy with the excitement of how many properties we were about to sell. But when you ask ‘2019 Rick’ the same question, I think, ‘Yeah, 5% rates and 5% appreciation is sure going to be slower than the 4% rates and 10% appreciation of 2016.

The lesson –– it’s all relative.

Does Anyone Remember?

To give you an idea of what a historic version of normal will look like, imagine a market with the following metrics:

6 to 8% mortgage rates (instead of 3.5%)
3 to 4% annual appreciation (instead of 8 to 10%)
45 to 60 day marketing times (instead of 7 to 14 days)
2 to 4% seller discounts (instead of multiple buyers with escalator clauses)

You see, the period from 1990 to 2005 looked a lot different than 2005 to 2018.

If you asked 1993 me what I thought of a 5% interest rates and 5% appreciation, I would have been giddy with the excitement of how many properties we were about to sell…

And, yes, I get it that many of the inputs are different (demographics, population trends, preferences, architecture, inventory, regulation, materials), but the period of 2005 to 2018 was about as unprecedented as one could imagine.

Honestly, I think a little more stability in housing is a good thing. NASDAQ levels of volatility in housing just isn’t healthy for anyone.

Segments Matter

So in our end of the year meeting at One South, we spent a lot of time on the idea of market segments. Segmenting (stated differently) is nothing more than looking at smaller samples of how connected sales behave, and not aggregating all housing into one analysis.

Pro Tip here –– If you ask an agent, ‘How’s the market?’ and they don’t ask a qualifying statement like ‘Which segment?’ or ‘What area are you referring to?’ then you need to find a new source of your information.

In the same way that New York’s housing market behaves differently than Orlando’s, the new construction market in western Chesterfield should behave differently than Bellevue does –– and this will be key in understanding the new market.

Segments and the Impact of Population

For years, the City of Richmond’s population was in decline. Chesterfield and Henrico were experiencing explosive growth, but the City was not.

Around 2000, the City population trend officially reversed.

In the latter 1990’s, you could feel it starting to happen. VCU was gobbling up properties by the handful and many of the long ignored Downtown neighborhoods began to see construction activity and new businesses popping up.

The population of Henrico and Chesterfield now need to compete with the City for residents and can no longer sustain their growth based on the City’s exodus.

When the 1990’s gave way to the 2000’s, the City’s population began to stabilize at just below 200,000 residents. As we now enter 2019, the population of the City is approaching 230,000, and (by most studies I have seen) is projected to continue to grow.

The Impact of Growth

For the last 5 years, extremely tight City inventory levels and incredibly competitive bidding wars (the worst we saw in 2018 was 18 offers on one house near Carytown, no joke!), especially at the lower price points, has been the norm.

What do you get when your supply is fixed and demand increases? Price appreciation, that’s what.

The growth rate within the City has not only equaled the growth rates of the surrounding counties, but might have actually exceeded them. Any agent who works the more urban markets will tell you that the impact of the growth has been dramatic.

So as long as this trend continues, if you own property in the City, you are probably sitting pretty.

The Behavior of Various Segments

Now when we compare pricing for various segments, what we tend to see is the areas where pricing is the most affordable and closer to the urban core have appreciated the most dramatically. Areas that are further out and/or more highly priced are the ones where pricing has gone up at a slower rate.

Now, with all general statements, there are going to be exceptions, but overall, the statement holds true. Take a look below at 5-year appreciation rates in different areas of the Metro.

Appreciation_Rates_ — These figures only include resale properties, not new ones.

As you can see, the appreciation rate differs greatly.

Does that mean that you have made a mistake or are subject to deflation in the coming years if you live in a suburban area with new construction? Not at all. It just means that you shouldn’t expect that your neighborhood will behave the same as the one with a lower price point or on the other side of town.

And the Reasons, Please?

What do Fox Hall, the Deep Run High School District, and Hallsley all have in common? Fairly high prices to begin with and a great deal of new construction nearby.

What do the Museum District, Bon Air, and Church Hill have in common? Relative affordability and great difficulty in building new homes on any sort of scale.

Simply put, we can’t build houses where we need them most AND we can’t build them at the prices that the market can easily afford.

As we have stated many times before, the ability to provide housing is easiest where land is plentiful. So in areas south and west of Route 288, as well as points east in Henrico, where large tracts of undeveloped land are available, it is far easier to create new communities of scale.

Building is Getting Harder

But as any builder will tell you, not only are they being forced to build further away from the urban core, their costs are skyrocketing (both materials and labor) and the mandates placed on them by the counties are increasingly burdensome.

Take a look at the chart showing what has happened to the cost of construction (labor + materials). The builders aren’t lying when they tell you how much their costs have increased.

Furthermore, the arrival of several national builders is going to change the way new homes are sold in Richmond. DR Horton, Schell Brothers, and Stanley Martin each have the financial backing to build more homes in a quarter than most of the local builders could hope build in a year. The big national builders can gobble up lot inventory, they have their own sales force, and have the capital to build new models for each section of the communities in which they sell.

The Return of Strategic Mortgage Decisions

Let’s shift from home prices to borrowing money.

For the better part of a decade, choosing a mortgage product has been pretty much a no-brainer:

What mortgage product do you choose when 30-year fixed rates are at 3.5%? You take the 30-year fixed rate because of the 30-year guarantee.
What mortgage product do you choose when 30-year fixed rates are at 4.5%? You take the 30-year fixed rate because of the 30-year guarantee.
What mortgage product do you choose when 30-year fixed rates are at 5.0%? You probably still take the 30-year fixed rate because of the 30-year guarantee.

But what happens when 30-year fixed rates are at 6.25% but a 5 year adjustable is at 5% and you only plan on being in your home for 5 to 7 years? The question becomes trickier, doesn’t it?

Welcome to the new (ok, old) world of mortgage finance.

In the 1990’s, we saw clients make the fixed vs adjustable mortgage decision all of the time.

But since rates cracked the 5% floor in 2010, taking the risk of an adjustable mortgage seemed unnecessary.

Where are we currently? We enter into 2019 with rates hovering around the 5% mark. And while no one can claim to be a master of perfectly predicting interest rates, the majority of industry experts feel that 30-year rates between 5.3 and 5.8% (or even as high as 6%) by year’s end are a real likelihood.

So as the spring market emerges and the demand for money increases, the shrewd buyers will keep an eye on the mortgage products OTHER than the 30 year fixed rate mortgage to see how large the spread is.

At some point, the spread between fixed and adjustable mortgages may justify selecting shorter term mortgage products –– especially when the expected hold period is less than 10 years.

Cue the ARM (the Adjustable Rate Mortgage)

Wait, did you just say that ARM’s are good?!? I thought that ARM’s were the thing that caused the financial crisis in 2008?!?

Well, if you don’t underwrite an ARM properly, then yeah, an ARM is not a good product. But no mortgage is safe if it isn’t underwritten correctly –– ARM or otherwise.

So let’s not blame the ARM, let’s blame the true culprit –– shoddy underwriting.

The blue is the percentage of loans underwritten in each year since 2001 that were considered Sub Prime. As you can see, the percentage of Sub Prime is far lower than in the years preceding the crash in 2008.

In the financial crisis of 2008, a great deal of focus of was placed on the Sub Prime mortgage industry. And there was no more abused loan product by the Sub Prime industry than the ARM.

Today’s Arms are Actually Underwritten

The difference today is that the ARMs issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and FHA are underwritten properly and also contain caps on the adjustments so that extreme swings in interest rates do not dramatically increase the risk of default. The Sub Prime ARM’s were neither underwritten with any rigor, nor were they capped in such a way as to minimize risk. (And in many cases, they were designed to fail, but that is another topic for another day.)

As an example, a 5/5 adjustable with a 2% cap means a mortgage with a fixed rate for 5 years with a maximum adjustment of 2% at then end of year 5, with another 5 years of the new rate before another adjustment. Is that overly risky? Not when applied correctly it isn’t.

What makes an adjustable mortgage product appealing? The rates tend to be lower –– especially the higher that the 30-year fixed rate becomes.

And while the spread between fixed-rate and adjustable rate products is not quite to levels that justify the switch, it might not be too far off in the future.

So if your loan officer suggests you take a look at an ARM, don’t reject the idea simply out your memory of 2008. An ARM, like a screwdriver or a shovel, is simply a tool. When you use a tool appropriately, they tend to work quite well.

Since 1991

So we (Sarah and Rick) have been in real estate –– as agents, brokers, lenders, developers, owners, and rehabbers –– for longer than we would like to admit. And consequently, we have had front-row season tickets to the booms, several busts, and each subsequent recovery.

We have had front-row season tickets to the booms, several busts, and each subsequent recovery…

What does that mean? It means our advice is based on experience that dates back to the early 1990’s.

In 1991, the median sales price of a home in the US was $120,000. It is now $315,600
In January of 1991, 30 year mortgage rates were 9.56%. They are now 4.75%
In 1991, the average rent was $649. It is now $1,450.
In 1991, there was no Zillow and no Trulia. As a matter of a fact, there was not even an online MLS

What else does it mean? It means our team is extremely excited to see times ahead where good decisions will rule the day, and not just momentum.

We love the fact that strategic decisions about mortgage are required, and not just blindly electing a 30-year mortgage, regardless of the situation
We love the fact that the need to make purchase decisions under multi-offer pressure will likely subside
And we love the fact that the data now exists to really help demonstrate the best course of action, and decisions are made based on information, not conjecture

Welcome to 2019, the leading edge of normal.

Frogs Rent

November 28, 2018 By Rick Jarvis

For most homeowners, I think it is going to be difficult to let go of the last few years.

‘Our house appreciated $75,000 in 5 years!’
‘Really? Our house went from $300,000 to 400,000 in 4 years!’
‘Not bad, but ours went from $150,000 to $400,000 in 3 years!’

Unfortunately, we won’t be saying that as often as we used to anymore.

A Return to Normal Appreciation

Being a homeowner, especially a first-time homeowner, has been a lot of fun for the past 5 years. The rate of appreciation has been substantial for most everyone in the post-bubble market. No matter where you live or what you bought, if you signed the closing statement in 2012, you are up anywhere from 20 to 40% in the years since.

But as we approach the end of 2018, we can expect to see future appreciation rates on housing return to the norms of the 1990’s and early 2000’s. And for those who know nothing about the good old days, I am talking about 2 to 4% in any given year (and yes, I realize how boring that sounds.)

That said, imagine if all of this topsy-turvey upsidedown-ness hadn’t happened, or even if prices had fallen over the last five years. Would you have been better off if you hadn’t bought at all?

The answer is simply –– nope.

Why? Because renters always lose in the long run.

Boiling a Frog

There is an old adage about boiling a frog (and no, I have not done this before so don’t call PETA). But it goes like this: If you put a frog in a pot of boiling water, it will immediately hop out. But if you put a frog in a pot of cool water and then put it on the stove, the temperature change is so gradual that the frog will stay in until it is too late.

And for this reason, frogs rent.

If you’re a renter feeling upset because I just compared you to a frog, don’t. For many, renting does make sense. Temporary situations, an uncertain future, recovery from a financial catastrophe, etc –– these reasons all make sense.

But if you are going to be here for a while, are trying to make a smart investment, or are otherwise in a position where you could own but don’t, then you are exhibiting frog-esque characteristics.

Tracking Rents

Zillow, for all of its warts (see what I did there?), has managed to aggregate a lot of really good data and they make it available if you know where to look. And besides tracking housing values (for which they are primarily known), they also track rents.

Take a look at this (use the drop down menu to find RVA, or to look at other markets):

Since 2011, rents in Richmond VA have gone up from an average of $1,179 per month to $1,391 per month. That’s nearly an 18% increase if you are scoring at home. And that chart is for the Richmond region as a whole. Areas such as Shockoe, Manchester, and Scott’s Addition are up by a much larger percentage.

Now, let’s think about the other side of the equation. Do you know how much of your mortgage you would have paid off in the same time period? If you had a 30-year mortgage at 4.5%, you would have paid off anywhere from 10 to 12% of your mortgage in the same time frame.

So even if your home had not grown in value by a single percentage point, owning would mean your payment would have remained the same, your debt would be 10 to 12% lower, and you would have also picked up a nice little tax write-off for the interest you had paid (but please consult your tax advisor to find out how much the Mortgage Interest Deduction would have saved you.)

It doesn’t take a math major to figure out that a fixed payment, lower debt, a nifty tax break, and the potential to eventually not have a house payment once your mortgage is paid off are all pretty good things.

Ribbit.

Elective Renting is a Poor Strategy

The housing market is rapidly putting the finishing touches on its post-bubble recovery and is approaching a time where housing appreciation will revert to the more normal rates of the 1990’s and early 2000’s. The promise of steep appreciation will not be what makes housing the sole reason for ownership as we move into the next decade.

Instead, the reason that housing will be one of the best assets you can own will be related to the reason it has always been a great asset –– its long-term value as a part of your portfolio will dwarf the short-term savings associated with renting.

So don’t fall for the ‘well, I should have bought 5 years ago so I should wait for the next bubble to pop’ logic. You will be far worse off.

Don’t believe me? Ask your landlord.

Getting Out of the Pot in 2019

So as 2018 comes to a close, be thinking about the fact that you will soon be getting a note from your management company notifying you of your new water temperature … errrr … rental rate for the coming year. If the landlord does their job right, the increase won’t make you leave –– it will be just enough to make you grumble, but stay.

Interest rates are beginning to edge up after years of staying below trend and house prices are still creeping upwards, too, albeit at a slower pace. Waiting for prices and rates to drop to 2012 levels again is simply not a winning strategy.

Is it getting a bit warm in here? Or is it just me …

How Much Does $1 Cost? A Critique of Real Estate Commissions

August 28, 2018 By Rick Jarvis

How much would you pay for one dollar?

No, it isn’t a trick question. And no, I am not looking for a finance major to explain time value of money or fungibility or another economic argument about scarcity, risk, or inflation.

Seriously, how much would you pay?

The answer is (wait for it) $1.

So What is 3% Worth?

Now, let’s take the same argument to the real estate world — how much would you pay for 3%?

When you decide you want to purchase a home and you enlist the help of a buyer’s agent, more often than not, the buyer’s agent will be paid roughly 3% of the transaction in the form of a commission. (Disclaimer: Commissions vary by property and company. This post is in no way an attempt to state that 3% is an industry standard.)

“Rarely does the 3% cost of the service equal the value provided by the agent.”

As a purchaser, you don’t really feel it, since the commission is typically paid from the seller’s proceeds. The commission line item is on the seller’s side of the ledger and feels far more onerous to the seller than it does the purchaser.

But I can safely say this: Rarely does the 3% cost of the service equal the value provided by the agent.

Cost Doesn’t Equal Value

So imagine a world where every product or service was the same price. Would you drive a Hyundai or a Mercedes? Would you eat McDonalds or Ruth’s Chris? Would you shop at WalMart or Nordstrom?

The answers are pretty obvious.

“Do you think that the quality of the advice matters – especially when all advice costs the same?”

But when it comes to working with Realtor, every agent costs essentially the same. So why not use the opportunity to choose the best one?

Wouldn’t you like to work with an agent who knows the value difference between a warrantable and non warrantable condo and the impact on property values? Or what about an agent who can demonstrate the 3 year appreciation rate difference between North Church Hill and Bon Air. Or could tell you at what point the marketing times spike and seller discount doubles in the Lee Davis High School district? Or James River High School?

Do you think that the quality of the advice matters – especially when all advice costs the same?

Meryl Streep or Lindsay Lohan

Warren Buffett said it best: “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.”

Very few industries operate where price and value have as little correlation as real estate sales – and for the shrewd client, this disconnect presents opportunity. Each and every buyer has the opportunity to work with the Realtor equivalent of LeBron James for the same price as J.R. Smith (sorry Cavalier fans, too soon?)

So spend some time researching your Realtor. It is the one place in life where you really have the opportunity to drink Dom Perignon for the same price as Budweiser.

Buying

The Escalator Clause

The Who’s Don’t Get Fooled Again still resonates 40 years after its release, doesn’t it?

What is an Escalator Clause (or EC)?

The Contract Price

The EC Contract Price

The Maximum (or Walkaway) Price

The ‘Beat It’ Number

Conclusion

How Does it Work?

The Premise (ok, ‘The Catch’)

The Players

The Game

Uses and Models

The Real Uses

Successful?

Richmond and iBuying

Questions Abound

Summary

Disclaimers

A Return to Comparative Normalcy

Does Anyone Remember?

Segments Matter

Segments and the Impact of Population

The Impact of Growth

The Behavior of Various Segments

And the Reasons, Please?

Building is Getting Harder

The Return of Strategic Mortgage Decisions

Welcome to the new (ok, old) world of mortgage finance.

Cue the ARM (the Adjustable Rate Mortgage)

Today’s Arms are Actually Underwritten

Since 1991

A Return to Normal Appreciation

Boiling a Frog

Tracking Rents

Elective Renting is a Poor Strategy

Getting Out of the Pot in 2019

So What is 3% Worth?

Meryl Streep or Lindsay Lohan

804.201.9683

<img class="wp-image-21067 alignright" title="Kendall C. Kendall, One South Realty's Client Care Coordinator" src="https://richmondrelocation.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Sarah-Jarvis-Team-One-South-Kendall-Kendall-0002_opt.jpg.webp" alt="" width="120" height="150" />

How Do I Schedule a Showing?

804.305.2344

How Do I Determine What I Can Afford?

<img title="Southern Trust Logo" src="https://richmondrelocation.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/CF_MortgageCorporation_Logo_ForDigital_RGB_Green.png.webp" alt="C&F Logo" width="217" height="113" />

Equal Housing

IDX Disclaimer

Contact The Sarah Jarvis Team

804.201.9683

Lending